A primary way for an attorney to communicate this credibility is through the quality of the language employed in his or her legal briefs to the Court. An attorney’s persuasive power resides in his or her perceived credibility in the eyes of the Justices. There are strong reasons why an attorney should avoid highly charged emotional language. It’s not the heart that compels conclusions in cases, it’s the law.” Scalia, in his legal-writing book with Bryan Garner, advises attorneys not to “make an overt, passionate attempt to play upon the judicial heartstring” as “t can have a nasty backlash.” Even Supreme Court Rule 24.6 – a rule the Justices themselves created – directs attorneys that a brief shall be “free of irrelevant, immaterial, or scandalous matter.” In her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sotomayor stated: “Judges can’t rely on what’s in their heart. Yet those same Justices counsel lawyers to avoid such emotional language. After all, they decide controversial issues that carry emotional weight for millions of people. Perhaps it should be unsurprising that the Justices use such language. Burwell “one of the most scathing and linguistically creative dissents in recent memory.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor also got in on the action, and wrote what one observer called a “blistering” dissent in Glossip v. Hodges “gorgeous, heartfelt, and a little mystifying ” another called Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in the case a “temper tantrum on paper.” One commenter called Scalia’s twenty-one-page dissent in King v. For example, one Court watcher recently called Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell v. Supreme Court opinions in recent years have employed controversial emotional language aimed to tug at the heart strings and to provoke ire. Ringsmuth is Associate Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University. Owens is Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin. Matthew Hall is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame. Black is Associate Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University. student in the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University. In 20, swastikas were found graffitied onto the middle school football field and the town’s new elementary school.Sarah Escalante is a Ph.D. In 2017, a Georgetown High baseball player was disciplined after allegedly directing an anti-Semitic slur at another player. Georgetown schools have experienced similar incidents before. The Georgetown Police were not available for comment on Sunday. I ask for calm and patience as we investigate this situation and arrive at a resolution that considers all of the facts and is satisfactory to all parties involved.” There are clearly strong emotions and many different versions of what happened at this game that is swirling around on social media. “The district has reached out to the administration at Roxbury Prep Charter High School in an attempt to gather facts and resolve the issues. “I want to clearly state that the Georgetown Public Schools will not tolerate racism in any form and is working with the Georgetown Police Department to investigate this allegation,” she wrote. She said the cause and the allegations of the use of racially charged language are under investigation. Georgetown Public Schools Superintendent Carol Jacobs put out a statement Saturday noting there was a “physical altercation” Friday involving players from both teams and several coaches. The final score was 44 to 8 against Roxbury. The fight that broke out prematurely ended the game, and Georgetown Police assisted in dispersing the crowd.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |